Free OIG LEIE Verification Tool | Healthcare Compliance Made Simple

Instantly verify healthcare providers against the official OIG database. Protect your organization with free, accurate, and always-current exclusion screening.
  • Direct OIG Connection
  • Monthly Updates
  • Free Searches
  • No Registration

Why Healthcare Organizations Trust Our OIG Search Tool

Real-Time Federal Database Access

  • Direct connection to OIG's official LEIE database
  • Updated monthly with the latest exclusion data
  • Immediate verification results

Efficient Provider Screening

  • Streamlined search process
  • Save hours of manual verification time
  • Built for healthcare organizations

Comprehensive Search Results

  • Complete exclusion history
  • Detailed provider information
  • Clear reinstatement status

Simple, Fast, and Reliable Verification

Smart Search Technology

  • Advanced name matching catches common variations and misspellings
  • Fuzzy logic reduces false negatives and ensures accurate results
  • Automated cross-referencing with multiple identifiers (NPI, Tax ID, License)
  • Real-time validation against the latest LEIE database

Instant, Accurate Results

  • Detailed match confidence scores for each result
  • Side-by-side comparison of similar matches
  • Easy-to-read exclusion status reports

Built for Compliance

  • Secure, time-stamped verification records
  • Instant verification results
  • Comprehensive search coverage
  • Easy-to-understand complian

Efficient Workflow

  • Batch processing for multiple providers
  • Quick re-verification of previous searches
  • Streamlined search interface
  • Single-click verification process

Frequently Asked Questions
About NPI Lookup

What is the LEIE Database?

The List of Excluded Individuals/Entities (LEIE) is the official database maintained by OIG that contains all individuals and entities currently excluded from participation in Medicare, Medicaid, and other Federal health care programs.

How Often is the LEIE Updated?

The LEIE is updated monthly with new exclusions, reinstatements, and other changes—our tool syncs with these updates to ensure current information.

What Should I Do If I Find a Match?

If you find a potential match, verify the information carefully using the individual's Social Security Number (SSN) or Employer Identification Number (EIN). Then, contact your legal counsel for guidance on the next steps.

How Do I Report Incorrect Information?

If you find incorrect information in the LEIE, contact the OIG at sanction@oig.hhs.gov with specific details about the entry that needs correction.

What Information is Included in Search Results?

Search results include the individual's or entity's name, address, exclusion type, and reinstatement date (if applicable). Some records may also include NPI numbers.

How Long Do Exclusions Last?

Exclusion periods vary. Mandatory exclusions have a minimum five-year period, while permissive exclusions may be shorter. Some violations result in permanent exclusion.

What's the Difference Between LEIE and SAM?

While both databases contain exclusion information, the LEIE is specific to healthcare programs, while SAM (System for Award Management) covers all federal procurement and non-procurement programs.
Ensure Your Organization's Compliance Today
Start Free OIG LEIE Search

Navigating OIG Exclusions: Essential Insights for Healthcare Leaders in 2025

In an era of heightened regulatory oversight, a deep understanding of Office of Inspector General (OIG) exclusions has become a critical pillar of healthcare compliance. Failure to comply with OIG can lead to potential repercussions ranging from staggering financial penalties to irreparable reputational damage. Healthcare organizations must be well-versed in the intricacies of OIG exclusions to navigate the complex healthcare regulatory landscape and avoid these severe consequences.

This comprehensive guide explores the fundamentals and demonstrates the impact of non-compliance. It also equips you with robust exclusion screening and response strategies. By being prepared and proactive, you can effectively manage OIG exclusions in your healthcare organization.

What Are OIG Exclusions?

OIG exclusions are exclusion actions—administrative measures that bar individuals or entities from participating in federal health care programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. They arise from violations such as healthcare fraud, patient abuse, financial misconduct, criminal offenses, or license revocations.

Once excluded, these providers are effectively off-limits for any reimbursed services, putting the organization that employs them at risk for severe penalties.

Mandatory and Permissive Exclusions: Two Types of Exclusion

Not all OIG exclusions are created equal. The types of exclusion generally fall into two broad categories:

1. Mandatory Exclusions

  • Imposed by law for specific offenses, such as Medicare or Medicaid fraud, patient abuse, or felony healthcare-related convictions.
  • These exclusions are non-negotiable and must be enforced once the offense is confirmed.

2. Permissive Exclusions

  • Triggered by other forms of misconduct (e.g., license revocations or lesser financial violations) where the OIG has discretion in determining whether and how long to exclude the individual or entity.
  • It can result from financial misconduct, certain misdemeanors, or even providing unnecessary management services under unethical circumstances.

Both mandatory exclusions and permissive exclusions can have severe consequences. Still, the period of exclusion (or term of exclusion) often varies based on the offense type and the severity of the misconduct.

Financial Impact

Violating OIG exclusion rules can produce swift and far-reaching financial and operational repercussions, underscoring the urgency and seriousness of the issue:

1. Direct Monetary Penalties:

Fines can reach up to $10,000 per item or service provided by an excluded individual or entity

2. Loss of Federal Reimbursements:

All payments from federal health care programs for services linked to an excluded individual may be revoked, forcing organizations to repay funds

3. Triple Damages Under the False Claims Act:

If the government deems submitted claims “false,” the liability can skyrocket due to treble damages

4. Additional Costs:

Corrective action plans, legal defense, and consulting fees for compliance remediation can push expenses into the millions

Case in Point: A large hospital in the Midwest unknowingly employed an excluded nurse for 18 months. Each service—ranging from medication administration to patient follow-ups—counted as a separate violation. By the time the issue was discovered, potential fines and damages soared into the millions, not including operational disruptions and repayment obligations.

Real-World Impact of Non-Compliance

Documented Cases and Settlements

Recent OIG cases illustrate the serious nature of compliance violations:This is some text inside of a div block.
Sagent Pharmaceuticals (2023)
  • Settlement Amount:
    $175,000
  • Violation:
    Failed to submit timely certified quarterly Average Sales Price (ASP) data to CMS
  • Time Period:
    Q2 2020 through Q3 2022
  • Location:
    Illinois
B. Braun Medical Inc. (2022)
  • Settlement Amount:
    $200,000
  • Violation:
    Failed to submit timely certified quarterly ASP data to CMS
  • Time Period:
    Q4 2019 through Q1 2022
  • Location:
    Pennsylvania
Laurus Labs Private Limited (2022)
  • Settlement Amount:
    $50,000
  • Violation:
    Failed to submit timely certified monthly and quarterly Average Manufacturer’s Price (AMP) data
  • Time Period:
    Various months and quarters in 2021
  • Location:
    New Jersey
These cases demonstrate that even administrative violations can result in substantial penalties. For exclusion violations, which directly affect patient care, the consequences are typically even more severe.

Operational Disruption

An exclusion violation has a ripple effect throughout an organization:
  • Immediate Cessation of Services:
    The excluded individual must instantly halt all patient care activities
  • Staffing Challenges:
    Organizations often scramble to find qualified replacements—sometimes in an emergency—causing disruptions in patient scheduling and care continuity
  • Extensive Audits:
    To determine the full scope of the violation, retrospective claims reviews, service assessments, and financial analyses must be conducted. This involves reviewing past claims and services provided by the excluded individual, assessing the impact on patient care, and analyzing the financial implications for the organization. These audits can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, further disrupting normal operations
  • Resource Redirection:
    Key staff and leaders devote significant time to compliance efforts, pulling resources away from patient care and strategic initiatives

Reputational Consequences

Even after fines are paid, the reputational fallout can linger:
  • Loss of Patient Trust:
    Patients may question the organization’s commitment to quality and safety
  • Media Coverage:
    Public disclosures and news reports can damage community relations
  • Strained Partnerships:
    Referral sources, payers, and potential collaborators may hesitate to engage with an organization facing compliance gaps

Legal Framework

The OIG’s exclusion authority is grounded in several federal statutes and regulations:
  • Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7)
  • Civil Monetary Penalties Law
  • False Claims Act
  • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
  • State Enforcement Statutes
Alongside these, the OIG utilizes various enforcement tools—from corporate integrity agreements to criminal prosecutions—to ensure providers take compliance obligations seriously.

Checking the List of Individuals: Key Exclusion Databases

Effective exclusion management requires a multi-layered verification protocol, tapping into several exclusion databases**:**
  • List of Excluded Individuals/Entities (LEIE)
    • Maintained by the OIG, updated monthly
    • Provides real-time verification and detailed information on each exclusion status
    • Maintained by the OIG, updated monthlyProvides real-time verification and detailed information on each exclusion statusOften referred to as the comprehensive list of individuals (and entities) prohibited from participating in federal health care programs
  • System for Award Management (SAM)
    • A federal-wide portal including procurement restrictions and broader federal program exclusions
  • State Medicaid Exclusion Lists
    • Each state may maintain its own database of excluded providers, which can be more restrictive than the federal list

OIG Screening Frequency and Scope

Effective exclusion management requires a multi-layered verification protocol, tapping into several exclusion databases**:**

Employee Screening

  • Pre-Employment Checks:
    Verify candidates before extending job offers
  • Ongoing Monthly Screening:
    Ensure current staff remains compliant
  • Documentation:
    Record search parameters, dates, and verification results to establish proof of diligence

Vendor and Contractor Management

  • Initial Verification:
    Screen all third-party vendors—especially those providing management services—before engagement
  • Continuous Monitoring:
    Re-check monthly or quarterly, depending on risk level
  • Contract Provisions:
    Include clauses requiring vendors to disclose any potential exclusion issues or changes

Medical Staff Oversight

  • Credentialing Integration:
    Incorporate screening into the credentialing and privileging process
  • Locum Tenens and Temporary Staff:
    Apply the same monthly screening rigor to all short-term hires

Documentation and Record-Keeping

Essential Documentation Components

Screening Records
  • Date, time, and scope of each search
  • Search parameters and exclusion databases used
  • Documentation of resolved potential matches
Program Documentation
  • Written policies and procedures
  • Staff training logs and completion reports
  • Investigation records, corrective action plans, and board oversight
Pro Tip: In audits, regulators often request proof of routine screenings. Comprehensive documentation not only demonstrates compliance but can also mitigate potential penalties.

Compliance Integration

Alignment with Overall Compliance Program:

Incorporate exclusion checks into broader audit schedules and compliance committees

Risk Assessments:

Evaluate and document any potential impact on patient services or reimbursement streams

Performance Metrics:

Track key indicators—such as screening completion rates—to measure program effectiveness and identify areas for improvement

Notice of Exclusion: Emergency Response Protocols for OIG Exclusion

When the OIG issues a formal Notice of Exclusion, or if a previously undetected exclusion surfaces, swift action is paramount.

Immediate Actions

  • Cease Billing for Affected Services
    • Prevent further submission of claims related to the excluded individual
  • Implement Interim Safeguards
    • Suspend the employee or contractor’s duties
  • Notify Key Stakeholders
    • Immediately inform legal counsel, executive leadership, and the compliance committee
  • Reassign Patients
    • Ensure continuity of care through alternative providers

Investigation and Documentation

  • Scope Analysis
    • Identify the timeframe during which the excluded individual rendered services
    • Determine the financial exposure and affected patient population
  • Evidence Collection
    • Preserve billing records, communication logs, and screening documentation
    • Gather internal reports on prior screening efforts
  • Corrective Action Implementation
    • Update screening protocols
    • Amend policies and procedures based on lessons learned
    • Retrain staff on new or revised compliance measures

Corrective Action and Continuous Improvement

Program Enhancement

  • Policy and Procedure Updates
    • Expand screening procedures to close gaps
    • Set clear responsibilities for each department
  • Staff Training and Education
    • Conduct regular refresher training on exclusion rules
    • Provide role-specific guidance for HR, billing, and clinical staff
  • Monitoring and Oversight
    • Increase auditing frequency, especially in high-risk areas
    • Implement regular board-level compliance reviews
    • Consider independent external audits for enhanced transparency

Performance Metrics

  • Screening Completion Rates:
    • Track the percentage of staff and vendors screened monthly
  • Documentation Accuracy:
    • Evaluate how thoroughly and consistently searches are recorded
  • Response Time:
    • Measure how quickly the organization halts billing and implements corrective actions upon discovering an exclusion

Conclusion

By embedding robust screening measures into everyday operations, healthcare organizations can mitigate financial risks, protect their reputations, and maintain patient trust. The potential benefits of effective OIG exclusion management are numerous, including improved patient safety, enhanced organizational reputation, and reduced financial liabilities.

Key Takeaways:

  • Stay Current:
    • Changes in federal and state regulations demand ongoing attention and updates to exclusion protocols
  • Be Proactive:
    • Monthly or even more frequent checks are crucial to staying ahead of potential violations
  • Document Everything:
    • Comprehensive records are the best defense against negligence or willful non-compliance allegations
  • Foster a Culture of Compliance:
    • From executive leadership to frontline staff, everyone plays a part in safeguarding the organization against exclusion risks
By understanding mandatory exclusions and permissive exclusions, regularly checking the exclusion status of all parties through official exclusion databases, and responding promptly upon receiving a Notice of Exclusion, healthcare organizations can better navigate the ****term of exclusion and protect their participation in federal healthcare programs from costly compliance breaches.This is some text inside of a div block.